Prediction of Jonathan Smith vs Marko Ostoja Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Smith vs M. Ostoja
Jonathan Smith
GBR
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
70
Age
65
-
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
130
Best Rank
74
0
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Marko Ostoja
CRO
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
70
Age
65
-
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
130
Best Rank
74
0
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 1 Ostoja
They have played 6 sets in total, with Jonathan Smith winning 3 and Marko Ostoja winning 3. The last match between Jonathan Smith and Marko Ostoja was at the Vienna, 19-10-1981, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jonathan Smith getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Smith | 1 |
| Ostoja | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R3) Vienna(10-19-81)
Jonathan Smith
6
2
6
Marko Ostoja
2
6
3
(R3) Cozenza CH(09-15-80)
Marko Ostoja
2
6
6
Jonathan Smith
6
3
3
J. Smith vs M. Ostoja H2H Profile
J. Smith vs M. Ostoja Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jonathan Smith has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marko Ostoja has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jonathan Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marko Ostoja has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jonathan Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marko Ostoja has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jonathan Smith has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marko Ostoja winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jonathan Smith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 29/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 22/38). Marko Ostoja has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 97/99), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jonathan Smith has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marko Ostoja has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jonathan Smith winning 1 times and Marko Ostoja being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Jonathan Smith winning 3 and Marko Ostoja winning 3.
- The last match between Jonathan Smith and Marko Ostoja was at the Vienna, 19-10-1981, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jonathan Smith getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jonathan Smith and Marko Ostoja have played a deciding set 2 times, with Jonathan Smith winning 1 times and Marko Ostoja 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jonathan Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marko Ostoja has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jonathan Smith has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marko Ostoja has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jonathan Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marko Ostoja has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jonathan Smith vs Marko Ostoja Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Smith vs M. Ostoja H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Smith 0%, Ostoja 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Smith 0%, Ostoja 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Smith 0%, Ostoja 0%.
J. Smith Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna - 18-11-1985 | ||||
R3  Sergio CasalS. Casal | L | 6-2 6-7 6-3 | ||
| Marrakech CH - 01-04-1985 | ||||
R3  Claudio MezzadriC. Mezzadri | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
 Vienna CH - 04-03-1985 | ||||
R3  Menno OostingM. Oosting | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Auckland - 07-01-1985 | ||||
R3  Broderick DykeB. Dyke | L | 6-7 6-0 6-3 | ||
 Melbourne - 24-12-1984 | ||||
R4  Christo Van RensburgC. Van | L | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
M. Ostoja Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gstaad - 09-07-1990 | ||||
R1  Cassio MottaC. Motta | L | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Bordeaux - 25-09-1989 | ||||
R4 Emilio SanchezE. Sanchez | L | 7-6 6-4 | ||
R3 Jose ClavetJ. Clavet | W | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Geneva - 11-09-1989 | ||||
R3  Gustavo LuzaG. Luza | W | 6-3 0-6 7-6 | ||
R4 Francisco YunisF. Yunis | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
J. Smith vs M. Ostoja Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.74% (66/96) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.03% (129/164) |
| 42.12% (171/235) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.44% (328/410) |
| 47.00% (1840/2075) | Games Win/Loss | 47.49% (3234/3576) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 31.34% (21/46) |
| 45.31% (29/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.49% (97/99) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 36.67% (22/38) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 619.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 455.11 |
| 25.00% (5/15) | Slam W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 64.71% (11/6) |
| 38.46% (35/56) | Main Tour W/L | 35.14% (65/120) |
| 53.06% (26/23) | Challenger W/L | 65.08% (41/22) |
| 43% (60/141) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (112/258) |
| 26% (5/19) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (15/32) |
| 48% (26/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (56/104) |
| 77% (70/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (127/99) |
| 23% (70/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (127/28) |
| 13% (91/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (166/31) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 13 Dec, 11:00 AM
PredictionP. Henning1
G. Kravchenko4W1
1.37
W2
2.8
Sat, 13 Dec, 10:00 AM
Prediction
S. Rocchetti8A. Mazzola2W1
2.18
W2
1.59
Sat, 13 Dec, 07:00 PM
PredictionV. Aboian3O. R. Batalla2W1
3.34
W2
1.27
Sat, 13 Dec, 11:00 AM
PredictionK. Dunneq
D. Khomutsianskaya8W1
2.2
W2
1.58
Sat, 13 Dec, 12:00 PM
PredictionF. IannacconeO. BondingW1
1.72
W2
1.98
Sat, 13 Dec, 10:00 AM
Prediction
D. N. MadarasSEM. D. Krom3W1
1.182
W2
4.15
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Anna Siskova vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Anhelina Kalinina vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
11 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Shuai Zhang vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
11 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Gabriela Andrea Knutson vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Hibah Shaikh
Yara BartashevichKaty DunneDaria KhomutsianskayaCristina BucsaAnhelina Kalinina
Anna-Lena FriedsamElsa JacquemotOzan BarisMichel HoppSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
Hibah ShaikhYara Bartashevich11:00
H2H 0-0
Katy DunneDaria Khomutsianskaya11:00
H2H 0-0
Cristina BucsaAnhelina Kalinina18:30
H2H 0-0
Anna-Lena FriedsamElsa Jacquemot20:30
H2H 0-0
Ozan BarisMichel Hopp10:00
H2H 0-0
